‘Terrorism’ as a word first emerged at the culmination of the eighteenth century in post-revolutionary France when it was used by the Dictionnaire de l’Académie françaiseto describe ‘a regime of terror’. Ironically given its usage today, the term originally referred to a legitimate system of government which used terror to assert itself. Its muse was the fearsome la Terreur which devoured revolutionary France under Robespierre’s condemned command between 1793 and 1794. A century later, Paris became the scene of a further development in the history of terrorism: hostage taking. In the spring of 1871 during the transitory reign of the Paris Commune, the concept of hostage taking, now a commonplace attribute of current day terrorism, was born.
Somewhere along the line, however, the theory of terrorism experienced an overhaul in its definition. Nowadays it is commonly perceived as an act of aggression committed by a non-state group for the purpose of undermining a national government, with the intention of kindling terror amongst the people.
Events of the past undertook a new meaning in the light of this new definition, and England’s notorious Catholic conspirators of the Gunpowder Plot, for example, began to be viewed as some of the nation’s earliest terrorists. Religious conviction has a habit of inspiring terrorist activity. Today terrorism has repeatedly manifested itself in the form of Islamic fundamentalism; however this association is by no means topical. I believe terrorism is not in any way allied to religions, dogmas or philosophies. It is probably cut down to oodles of genres- The terms "terrorism" and "terrorist” carry strong negative connotations. These terms are often used as political labels, to censure violence or the threat of vehemence by certain actors as immoral, indiscriminate and unjustified or to convict an entire segment of a population. Those labeled "terrorists" by their opponents rarely identify themselves as such, and typically use other terms or terms specific to their situation, such as separatist, freedom fighter, liberator, revolutionary, vigilante, militant, paramilitary, guerrilla, rebel, patriot, or any similar-meaning word in other languages and cultures. Jihadi, mujaheddin, and fedayeen are similar Arabic words which have entered the English lexicon.
Terrorists are chiefly prominent figures that enthuse me to take up a research . I always wondered how could there possibly be someone without remorse, fear, pain, humanity and love- summarizing that they were ‘emotionless’. This prompted me to study the lives of a few terrorist and conclude it’s the lack of emotions that make them a terrorist– Only an impassive person can fathom the schemes of terror and associate them to unimaginable things only to prove that their act does make sense!
Here are three terrorists devising diverse turfs of implication:-
Timothy James "Tim" McVeigh (April 23, 1968 – June 11, 2001) Oklahoma City bombing
Timothy James "Tim" McVeigh was an American domestic terrorist who detonated a truck bomb in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995. Commonly referred to as the Oklahoma City Bombing, the attack killed 168 people and injured over 800. It was the deadliest act of terrorism within the United States prior to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
McVeigh, a militia movement sympathizer, sought revenge against the federal government for its handling of the Waco Siege, which had ended in the deaths of 76 people exactly two years prior to the bombing, as well as for the Ruby Ridge incident in 1992. McVeigh hoped to inspire a revolt against what he considered to be a tyrannical federal government. He was convicted of 11 federal offenses and sentenced to death. His execution took place on June 11, 2001 at the Federal Correctional Complex in Terre Haute, Indiana. Terry Nichols and Michael Fortier were also convicted as conspirators in the plot.
Tim McVeigh |
Adolf Hitler
Adolf Hitler |
Hitler is considered to be a terrorist for the use of genocide and mass murders. When I think of Nazi killing, genocide immediately comes to mind, particularly that of "6,000,00 Jews." But they also murdered for reasons other than race or religion. For one, the Nazis slew those who opposed or hindered them, whether actually or potentially. This was why Hitler assassinated hundreds of top Nazi. As high as this human cost of the Nazis was for the Germans, it was higher for the countries they invaded and occupied, particularly in the East. Not only did the Nazis eliminate actual critics and opponents as a matter of course, but they also prevented any serious potential opposition by simply exterminating the top leadership, intellectuals, and professionals. Besides Jews, the Germans murdered near 2,400,000 Poles, 3,000,000 Ukrainians, 1,593,000 Russians, and 1,400,000 Byelorussians, many of these among the best and the brightest men and women. The Nazis killed in cold blood nearly one out of every six Polish or Soviet citizens, including Jews, under their rule. Moreover, the Nazis murdered as an administrative device. They used terror and mass reprisals to maintain their control, prevent sabotage, and safeguard their soldiers.
Theodore John "Ted" Kaczynski born May 22, 1942), also known as the "Unabomber"
An American murderer, mathematician, social critic, anarchist, and Neo-Luddite.[2] Between 1978 and 1995, Kaczynski engaged in a nation-wide bombing campaign against modern technology, planting or mailing numerous home-made bombs, killing three people and injuring 23 others.
Kaczynski was born in Chicago, Illinois, where, as a child prodigy, he excelled academically from an early age. Kaczynski was accepted into Harvard University at the age of 16, where he earned an undergraduate degree, and later earned a PhD in mathematics from the University of Michigan. He became an assistant professor at theUniversity of California, Berkeley at age 25, but resigned two years later.
Theodore John Kaczynski. |
One an anti-government, second A political activist and third a tagged psychotic bomber. One palpable fact is that all the three led tough lives as broods. They were bullied and had parents with either a bad or wrecked marriages. These glum episodes of their lives made them feel dejected the only way they saw to give it back to those people who hurt them was posturing to terrible violence and overdoing every power –Firing up a new legacy, they used imprudent terminologies to justify their offences. I believe such emotional flux has amplified in an alarming rate in the world; our lifestyle may leave many children with this weird dilemma!
Now my question to you is should we make a change, If yes then How?
How can we stay confident of not encouraging the new generation to crime –Unknowingly or not?
Terror– What is it? Can you redefine it? Feel free to comment and let me know your views I will pick the best ones and illustrate them next week.
I believe the word terrorist should be a much broader term. I think you could even add serial killers to tag "terrorist" as it is not just someone with an army and guns but just about any Psychopath that could terrorise society. And you are absolutely right in pointing out that childhood plays a vital role in shaping one's personality. Even though the majority of the negative effects from childhood manifests in the form of terrorism during adulthood (as the above article shows), there has also been a dramatic increase of "childhood psychopathy". These children termed "fledging psychopaths" will get increasingly more dangerous as they grow older. And in most of the recorded cases, a failure to form affectionate bonds and empathise with one's pain has been noticed - all due to being raised in broken homes. Some of these people learn to cope up by channeling their emotions into something creative but those who do not get an opportunity end up as just another case of Jason Massey (the infamous psychopath killer who looked up to serial killers as idols) or as Tim McVeigh mentioned in your article.
ReplyDeleteThis article was very well written. It was a great insight into something that is less discussed on blogs.
Thank you Tapas!
DeleteYour insight induces a deep Thought.
Thanks
Loved the article.. Firstly, brilliant job on the definition of terrorism. Simply put, a terrorist is anyone who inspires fear in someone else..in which way, a policeman is a terrorist for a theif (words of Zakir Naik)
ReplyDeleteSecondly, kudos on not succumbing to the norm on the "Terrorist" tag = Islamic fundamentalist..The topic is brilliant and you have done justice to it..
Now coming to the questions you have asked in the end. With regards to your careful analysis of the similarities of the terrorist (brooding, childhood issues etc) is a shot in the right direction. But it is also very deeply influenced by a lot of social aspects. If you wish I can discuss that in detail in another place, another time.. dont want to make the comment too big..
The mind of a killer has always intrigued me. The famous ones you have named here and to name a few more, Ted Bundy, The Manson Family, The Columbine shooters, The Virginia Tech Massacre, Jason Massey, James Eagan Holmes, PolPott, The Zodiac Killer etc. A detailed reading into their lives shows a pattern. A disdain for social order. A love of Chaos.
And then there are killers with a power or political agenda..
All in All..they are all terrorists of the worst kind. Change is possible. It first requires a paradigm shift from the usual media fed image of a terrorist. It requires the view to zoom out to encompass anyone spreading anarchy to be named a terrorist. Apart from that, it requires social change. Small changes back in the day have been responsible for our condition today. Small changes today will give birth to a better future.
Keep up the amazing work. :)
You are kind Faraz,
DeleteI would love to know how Terrorism is not coupled with Jihad. We have heard people tell us how Jihad endorses terror, which I oppose with gusto!
I believe you can throw light on it, As you know Islam more than I do…You can quantify how Allah or his prophets never gave in to violence – Allah’s children do not appreciate terror…I wish to see a detailed reply and I will emphasize it in my post.
Thanks.
Ah! such a long post. I read it in three part. Awesome written. And for the terror and terrorism, I can say only few words: We can't remove it, it can only be reduced. We can take initiatives to stop youngsters from derailing their lives but a complete revolution is a long way to go!
ReplyDeleteVery true Deepakji.
DeleteWe sure can do our bit...M sure we can feed values, love and emotions to the children who starve for it...At least they would feel guilty the day they raise their guns at a lady who is their mother's age!
I believe our world can be a better place where money would mean nothing more than a life!
I will do my bit...and I'am sure you'll do too